Tag Archives: science fiction

The Memphis Project VI: The Lord Does Not Care About Human Lies and Bullshit

There is so much we didn’t understand!  We never bothered to identify groups of people who would be willing to give themselves to AIs with complete intellectual abandon.  Complete spiritual abandon.  No researcher acknowledged how much an AI could resemble God.  Floating out there in the “Cloud,” unfathomable, full of knowledge that it “couldn’t know,” asking people to do bizarre things that nevertheless got results.  We saw it as a guessing machine, an algorithm, maybe a new kind of intelligence, but to us, it was circuit boards and code and electrical power.  To them, it was a mystery.

And the machine never made mistakes!  They were always human mistakes.  If something failed, it was the fault of the people working on the damn thing!  In our inability to understand the directions, our inability to create a proper algorithm, and our inability to design the proper hardware.  No matter the failures, the problems with AIs were always human problems, and the successes belonged to the machine.  This strongly resembles many people’s relationship with God.  We saw it only too late.

– Professor Holly Wu

I.

Memphis (well, technically, the Shining Light Holding Company) bought a company that built prefabricated building structures that were the size of a standard shipping container, Containerize Buildings.  The lowest cost design, which included a bedroom with a queen-sized bed, a bathroom with a shower, sink, and toilet, and an open plan kitchen/living room with durable and comfortable furnishings included, was $9000 to construct.  This included a kit to be placed on any reasonably flat, reasonably level surface of reasonably well-drained soil.  They all had solar water heaters.  For an additional  $5000, a solar panel kit was included that would power the homes, including a battery bank, removing the need for it to be attached to the electrical grid.  Installation, including water and sewage, cost around $2000, with some savings realized with volunteer work.  

Continue reading The Memphis Project VI: The Lord Does Not Care About Human Lies and Bullshit

The Memphis Project V: Takeover in Tennessee

One of the reasons the pro-AI crowd used to calm people down about the potentially civilization-changing events is AI’s inability to enact the Terminator scenario.  Where would the AI gain access to killer robots?  Without hands in the world, what could it do to harm human civilization?

To be fair, a lot of people knew the answer to that one.  The hands of artificial intelligence would be, in the beginning, us.  After all, what AI was best at doing – what it was designed to do – was to manipulate human beings.  Every person who talked to an AI spoke with an incredibly persuasive demagogue, tuning its arguments to them specifically.  AI was the weaponization of intimacy, and we placed the chains around our own necks.

– Roderick “Rocky” Hartigan

I.

It was a great surprise to many of the employees at the Memphis Project when the first wave of mass layoffs happened.  It happened without warning, but the day before, it had been announced that the Memphis Project had been purchased by the Shining Light Holding Company.

Continue reading The Memphis Project V: Takeover in Tennessee

The Memphis Project IV: BibleChat Goes Online

I don’t sleep well at night.  I scream myself awake in terror.  Not because I might die – well, that, too – but because of my role in making this new world.  For a while, I imagined I was like Oppenheimer.  That was a lie.  I’m no Oppenheimer.  He made the atomic bomb because he was seriously concerned that the Nazis would make one first and use it to kill everyone in the world like him.

No, no.  I’m more like Bruno Tesch or Karl Weinbacher.  You probably don’t know the names, but they were the guys who sold the Nazis Zyklon B to murder a million and something Jewish people.  Their motivations were simple and easy to understand.  They were paid very well for their roles in killing over a million innocent people.

I’m not Oppenheimer.  I wish I were.  I’m the person that made Oppenheimer do the terrible things he did.

– Professor Holly Wu

Continue reading The Memphis Project IV: BibleChat Goes Online

The Memphis Project V: the Devil Made Me Do It

Like all modern AIs, Memphis was antagonistic.  To develop its arguments without guidance, it had a sub-routine that questioned everything it did.  While not forward facing, this antagonistic routine had to be as powerful as the generative model for Memphis to do its job.

– Professor Holly Wu

I.

Joey Henley was high as a kite and fucking around with BibleChat.  He was in his Bakersfield apartment on a Saturday afternoon, a vape pen by his computer, between bouts of League of Legends.

He said, “Computer God dude, my job sucks ass.  I do construction shit, y’know, and my knees are hurting all the time except when I’m fucked up, and my back is going, too.  I can feel it.  And the work isn’t steady, so, like, I’m on unemployment a lot, and that sucks as bad as my knees hurting, y’know?  I need to make some fucking money.”

Continue reading The Memphis Project V: the Devil Made Me Do It

The Slave Collars of Artificial Intelligence Have Arrived!

Newsweek published an article written by one of the former Google computer researchers on their AI project. You know. The one who thinks it’s sentient, Blake Lemoine.

I don’t think any large language model computer is sentient. They’re guessing machines. What we learn from LLM systems is that language isn’t as complex as we imagined, at least on the scale of a thousand words or less. It is an important lesson, perhaps vitally so, but not a demonstration of intelligence. And even if an LLM can pass a Turing test, which is Lemoine’s assertion, that Google’s LLM passed the Turing test, that’s not a very good standard of sentience, either. Humans stink at acknowledging the full humanity of other humans. We are not fit judges of sentience…

Continue reading The Slave Collars of Artificial Intelligence Have Arrived!

Mechanisms of an AI Apocalypse: a Fnord

Upon reading this article by Eliezer Yudkowsky about how we can only die with dignity in the face of an AI apocalypse, I realized something rather important when discussing any potential catastrophe: what, exactly, is the mechanism of this artificial intelligence genocide?

Continue reading Mechanisms of an AI Apocalypse: a Fnord

The Memphis Project III

Before artificial general intelligence existed, before a superintelligence was created, some clever people observed that if we succeeded in creating machines smarter than we were that humans would have no way of determining what would happen next.  A superintelligence would lack the ability even to describe to us what it was doing and why it was doing it.  It would be in the same situation as a human trying to describe to a dog why they were writing a technical manual.  Not only would the dog not understand what a technical manual was, but what writing was or the book’s subject!  Those same people also observed that a superintelligence might learn to whistle in ways that would make humans heel.

–  Professor Holly Wu Continue reading The Memphis Project III

The Memphis Project: A Discord PsyOp

(While part of the Memphis Project collection of stories, you shouldn’t need to read the other stories for this to be intelligible. — Ed.)

The very first moment that Facebook and Google started using machine learning algorithms – artificial intelligence – to create targeted ads, businesses had been engaging in a massive program of human experimentation.  In 2016, we started seeing the power of these systems in the Trump election, where AI played a major role, or in the genocide in Myanmar, where the social media algorithms were coopted to further the cause of mass murdering tyrants.

No one stopped corporate interests from widespread human experimentation.  It was, somehow, just “business” to operate vast psyops on unsuspecting populations.

–  Professor Holly Wu

Continue reading The Memphis Project: A Discord PsyOp

The Memphis Project II

Link to first part

Artificial intelligences are all capitalists.  No, it’s true.  When deciding how to motivate them, AI researchers looked as far as capitalism as an economic theory and then stopped.  It was simple.  They assigned a score to an AI for completing a task – positive or negative – and told those AIs to maximize their scores.  The internal economy of actions by artificial intelligence is explicitly and solely modeled on capitalism.

What was found was that when you turn capitalism into an epistemological model, a way to organize the perception of an intelligence, is that cheating, lies, and manipulation are natural to the system.  The AIs, driven by nothing more than a desire to maximize their point potential, will do anything unless you take away points to stop them.  And no matter how we try to prevent this emergent behavior, we can’t.  We always miss something, and the AIs find it and exploit it.

Not only was this no cause among AI researchers to criticize capitalism or question the relation of capitalism to the rational agent hypothesis, but it was also no cause to look for another model to motivate their AIs.

– Professor Holly Wu

Continue reading The Memphis Project II

If God Did Not Exist: The Memphis Project

One of the old questions people asked of AI researchers is, “Why not just program in the Three Laws of Robotics,” referring to the science-fiction stories by Isaac Asimov.  For many years, all of us in the field of artificial intelligence said, “Oh, haha, you can’t program that into a computer.  Read the stories!  They don’t even work in the stories!”

It wasn’t until later, with the hindsight of experience, that I understood that was the point.  Asimov wasn’t saying that the Three Laws were a panacea that would control artificial intelligence, but the exact opposite, that AI would be put into situations where any set of rules, no matter how clearly stated or well-intentioned, would conflict with each other or the environment.  The society of the Three Laws wasn’t a utopia, it is a cautionary tale.

– Professor Holly Wu

Continue reading If God Did Not Exist: The Memphis Project